I used to play boardgames once a week with my brother-in-law Jim and a couple of dudes named Bruce and Al. Bruce and Al are a couple of real old school mofos. As I recall, they were founding members of the University of Illinois wargames club and the original organizers of the local con. And Al bought a copy of OD&D at Gen Con the year it came out and turned the campus nerdos onto RPGs. In a side room in Bruce's basement is monster wargame that recreates the European theatre of WW2 at the battalion level. The two of them started playing this beast more than 20 years ago as a playtest. I'm pretty sure the publisher went out of business many years ago with the game unpublished, but last I knew they still play a turn or two some weekends.
So even as a grown-ass man with a job and a wife and a kid, I was still the snot-nosed newbie among these guys. For months one of the things that mystified me about these guys was the fact that, whatever game we were playing, these guys always referred to the equivalent of the Encounter Player as "the bunny." This practice mystified me, but I never asked because I was usually too busy trying to get the gist of whatever weird boardgame we were playing that night. Often, everybody else at the table had played it a bunch and it was new only to me, so I was always playing catch-up. Still, I would dutifully pass "the bunny" to the next player when instructed to do so. Finally, one night we played some train game (Santa Fe something?) and it all came into focus. The special token in whatever-game-it-was happened to be a little wooden steam engine token that, when stood up with the front of the train pointing to the sky, looked a helluva lot like a little black rabbit.
The reason I am bringing this up this dumb anecdote is because some days I wonder if some D&D groups could use a bunny at their table. What often happens in a dungeoneering expedition is that one player, the most energetic, motivated, and/or charismatic, tends to make the majority of the decisions, like whether to turn right or left at a T intersection. They become the de facto Caller. I sometimes call this person the Quarterback because if you metaphorically give them the ball they will try to do something with it. Not every player does.
But I think you could draw out a few more active players if there was something like a Bunny. If the Caller role passed after every combat or something like that. Everybody takes a turn leading the party. Maybe use a little skull as the marker.
Capital idea! May give that a try!
ReplyDeleteMaybe the bunny (gotta change the name, hoss) has the power of inner monologue... everyone sitting at table has to listen to it.
ReplyDeleteThere's a book series called Redwall - it is about an abbey called Redwall, it is inhabited by anthropomorphic animal people - the whole world that Redwall is set in is.
ReplyDeleteRedwall is next to a vast wood called mossflower - in this wood lives a bunch of shrews, who are in a group called Guosim (Guerilla Union of Shrews in Mossflower) - and they have something similar. To the bunny.
They had a black stone - the shrew that held it could talk, and only that shrew - but this just led to more arguments and everyone not listening - instead most of them were just waiting for their turn to hold the stone.
The main character gets fed up and leaves, to go do something dangerous and heroic - and the shrews realize that they need to pick a clear leader and chuck the stone away.
I'm not sure if it would be the same - but in my limited experience, using something like the bunny might just be more problematic.
I think it is much better to follow the advice you gave me, and just call people individually by name - and also just put forth a general effort to make sure that people know that they have agency and need to do things.
It could be interesting to have a possessed person, like an object that makes the player become an possessed by a ghost - then they would pass it over when someone else wanted to roleplay as the ghost or gain powers.
The reason why boardgames make this design decision is for multiple reasons, like turn tracking, flow of gameplay, or rotating powers or mechanical advantages - but maybe the same ideas could work on RPG players - I think I might have to give it a try.
I'll think of it like a camera - or maybe a camera angle: they are in focus and the other PCs and foes are there and bring panned to as things happen, but the person in front of the camera is the main person.
Dunno - in any case, this is a good blogpost to think about - trying to get players to interact is one of the hardest things to do - there are just some people that need continual prompting, and maybe this is a way to make it clear
Sometimes people just need a leader that decides things, sometimes they need to be told who the leader is.