Wednesday, January 25, 2012

now with labels!

Print
Posted by Jeff Rients at 12:00 PM
Labels: , , , ,

13 comments:

  1. Every map should have an overlook labeled "Cliffs of Insanity"

    ReplyDelete

  2. Much more revealling. To my mind however, B/F are mismatched. If B is a tree, F is not a stump (unless it's a HUGE stump), and if F is a stump, B is not a tree. Stll, not bad overall.

    ReplyDelete

  3. F was a hugeass tree. They pissed off the local druids when it was cut down.

    ReplyDelete

  4. Of what are the heaps heaped?

    ReplyDelete

  5. The only thing I wasn't sure about in the earlier version was the the dark arch shapes below. I was guessing they were cave entrances, but they also looked like hills, barrow mounds ect.

    ReplyDelete

  6. Alex: The rubble of the great keep that used to stand in the courtyard.

    ReplyDelete

  8. I have a feeling I know where those nymph statues came from.......

    ReplyDelete

  10. Very cool Jeff! Makes the choices more choosy. Plus, I still retain my mental image from the first trip, so good all round.

    ReplyDelete

  11. Exactly the sort of thing I'd need to make decisions - awesome. One question: is the castle at the top or bottom of the cliff? (I know how it goes at Tintagel (not the way I'd've assumed) but Dundagel might be different)

    Captchaword; ramillot. Ovine King Arthur's royal court?

    ReplyDelete

  12. You can tell from the elevation lines that it must be at the top, otherwise the sea would pour into it.

    The heaps do look a little midden-heapy, more than the toppled stones of an ancient castle, but I guess anyone who's actually been to Dundagel will know what they stand for.

    ReplyDelete

  13. @john - the cliffs of insanity are not connected to the mound on which the castle rests, the little white gap makes it ambiguous - I'm asking if they lead up or down from the castle

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)