A Return to the Stars
-
After a veeeeerrrryyyy long, and mostly unplanned, hiatus, Stuart and I got
together to play more Stargrave in recent days. It was good! It was also a
bit ...
Thursday, March 23, 2006
Worst cigar ever?
Since getting married and starting a family my tobacco usage has dropped considerably, but every once in a while I will smoke one of my pipes or enjoy a cigar. My tastes in tobacco generally involve premium stuff you can only find in specialty shops, but I don't consider it beneath me to occasionally light up convenience store cigars or pipeweed. After all, I got started with Swisher Sweets and Captain Black. My tastes have expanded and evolved since those early days, but to say they've refined might not be completely accurate. I still prefer vanilla aromatics over more 'serious' pipe tobaccos and my favorite stogie is a Mexican number called Te Amo that sits comfortably in the shallow end of the premium pool. So given my less-than-sophisticated tastes, when I happened recently to come into possession of a Phillies Strawberry, I felt duty bound to try the dang thing. You may have seen the Phillies line of fruit-flavored cigars in your local gas station check-out line. I've been morbidly curious about these strange stogies for a while, since I recall hearing tales of an excellent chocolate cigar from somewhere in the Low Countries. Maybe a strawberry cigar could be an interesting smoke. Anyway, the tobacco in the Phillies Strawberry was harsh and hard and dry. No surprise there; that's the standard for cigars bought in the wild. The strawberry effect was apparently acheived by dipping this pitiful little stick in the same sort of fake strawberry crap that is used in children's candy and cheap strawberry creme cookies. It's like the difference between orange Koolaid and fresh squeezed orange juice. As I understand it Phillies are popular among the cannabis smokers, something about removing the tobacco and replacing it with marijuana. I don't move in those social circles, so I'm not exactly certain what the motivation is for performing amateur surgery on these poor defenseless cigars. But you could probably remove the tobacco and replace it with yard clippings and end up with a better smoke.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Dear god! I can't believe you subjected yourself, your body, and your tastebuds to something like that!
ReplyDeleteAt the tobacconist where I worked in earlier years, the Phillies were seen as the absolute lowest of the stinking low; and yes, they are almost exclusively bought to roll joints with. Why? Because it makes for a great big "fattie", and the fucking things hardly cost anything.
But really, seriously my brother, don't do this kind of thing. Its better to "smoke cigars that are twice as good, half as often". A friend of mine who gave me my first cigar taught me that, and I'm glad I never lost that lesson.
Currently, I've just finished buying a beautiful Cedar Humidor and 50 Reina de la Vega cigars (of various sizes, everything from a panatella to a robusto and corona especial); because when you buy a humidor at the Reina de la Vega store, they fill it with cigars for you. Now that's a deal!
One of these days you'll have to come down here and we'll smoke a few good cigars (and pipes).
RPGPundit
http://www.xanga.com/RPGpundit
You actually smoked that one?!?!
ReplyDeleteWell, my dear, since you regularly smoke manufactured cigarettes you may find the quality of the tobacco less hideous than I do. Did that sound snobbish enough?
ReplyDeleteGeez, I remember smoking Swisher Sweets and--what was it--Bering Imperials--in high school (I felt they afforded me quite the gravitas, don't you know), but I never touched the Phillies. I was always curious, though. I can now say that is no longer the case.
ReplyDelete