Yeah, my M-U wears a Ming collar and sports a soul patch where his beard should be. He's only first level. I'm sure it's just a phase he's going through.
*The next part contains SPOILERS for Keep on the Shadowfell, so considered yourself warned.*
So in the kobold lair there's a maniac goblin named Irontooth who apparently wrecks the shit of every party that faces him. Stuart told us that according to the internets, this guy is the module's number one source of Total Party Kills. Seriously, who writes this crap? I know DMs have always been free to beef up monsters and that giving humanoids levels has a long and beautiful history. But why the hell do you write a game where my puny 1st level Harry Potter has 23 hit points if all you're going to do is give the goblin in session #2 over a hundred HP? I just don't effin' get it. What is being accomplished by making 1st level the new 4th level and turning the goblins into hill giants? I've been in plenty of campaigns where the DM wanted to skip the first few levels, so we did. And I've also been in lots of campaigns where everyone slugged it out with rats and mosquitos for a their first thousand xp. The latter seems to not be supported anymore. I hear it's not "fun". Are kids nowadays afraid of rolling up new characters or something? [/angry old man]
But like I said, last night's game was fun. I enjoyed pushing my piece around and selecting my attack options. And setting kobolds on fire is always a good time. But I also couldn't shake this feeling that it wasn't very Dungeony or Dragony. I don't think it was a coincidence that Doug made a couple of BattleTech jokes during the run. ("I move here. Now that my legs are in the water I lose heat points faster." That sort of thing.) For my own part, I started having flashbacks to my mid-nineties obsession with the HERO System, where each fight consisted of pushing dudes around a hexgrid and trying to figure out what trick to use from your Multipower array. Said out loud it's not that different from what a wizard does in any edition of D&D, but I feel an essential difference in my gut.
At the end of the session we agreed to play a third session and that maybe we should add some strikers to the party. Anybody in the area want to run a Rogue, Warlock, or Ranger with my crew? If not, I may have to carry through with my threat to double up and run a ninja-themed Rogue. Before heading out the door, Stuart maybe put his finger on this whole 4e mess: if we're having fun, how much does it matter whether or not the game "really" is D&D? I think for me the answer is "it matters at least some", even setting aside the fact that what Hasbro markets has repercussions for the hobby at large.
Or to put it another way, as my wife and I got in bed last night I told her "I had a good time tonight, but I think I'd rather be playing Dungeons & Dragons."
%202.png)
.JPG)
.png)
.gif)
Posts
"I move here. Now that my legs are in the water I lose heat points faster."
ReplyDeleteOK, that's gold. :)
Jeff,
ReplyDeleteI'd roll in but I am booked through to the end of August. That bad guy is tough without a decent team. We had two paladins and a cleric use up all their healing to get the party through that encounter. At one point we had half the party down.
I thought the game reminded me of an arcade version of D&D.
I know EXACTLY the feeling you are experiencing on this whole thing of level gain without trial. That's probably the main thing that bugs me (and keeps me from playing) a lot of settings (the fact that many systems want to set the hyperdrive on that and don't seem geared on moving up slowly and earning it)...that was one great thing about old school D&D!
ReplyDeleteI think for many, a faster progression does make sense, but I'm not sure what a good progression is. My high school and college days of 8+ hour sessions every week (sometimes twice a week in college) don't translate as well into an adult life of 4 hour sessions perhaps 3 times a month (and some folks can even only manage once or twice a month).
ReplyDeleteFrank
I'm with you - I just don't get how upping the starting power level of characters or speeding up levelling in general is supposed to make the game more fun.
ReplyDeleteThe longest running game I was in ran 2 years for 4-5 hours once a week. It took those 2 years to get to 10th level and it was fun through all the levels because the DM made it so - there was always something to do that only the party _could_ do. Making everything more powerful wouldn't have improved the game in any way....maybe I'm just old, but I don't get power for power's sake.
"[...]even setting aside the fact that what Hasbro markets has repercussions for the hobby at large."
ReplyDeleteAnd good luck trying to actually set that aside ;)
Nice to see the Heroscape castle getting some use there. Actually, I think Heroscape will see a lot of use with 4e.
ReplyDeleteagreed, not D&D per se. Fun, but not D&D as we knew it.
ReplyDeleteGuys, sorry to break up the 4E harp-fest in here, but you don't level up faster in this edition. You level up slower. Monsters give you less experience. In my 3.5 games, my players would usually level up from about 3 to 4 sessions of play, especially at low levels. My party of 4th level players hasn't leveled from 5 games (though they're close).
ReplyDeleteLet's also not forget that nostalgia can be a big, important factor in how much a player will like a system. I know that RIFTS is like the most godawful broken system ever, but I still enjoy dusting it off from time to time.
Oh, and that fireball is amazing.
I have a 4e rogue based on my first 3e character all statted up and ready to go, and no campaign to play him in. Unfortunately, Urbana is a bit of a drive from St. Louis, and I've already read the adventure in preparation for running it myself...
ReplyDelete